Wednesday 4 November
Global

Your region, kept on this device.

Imperva

Company

Imperva, Inc. was an American cyber security software and services company which provided protection to enterprise data and application software. The company is headquartered in San Mateo, California.

From Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. Shown as published there.

Facts

Country
United StatesSource: Wikidata
Founded
2002Source: Wikidata
Founded by
Amichai Shulman, Mickey Boodaei, Shlomo KramerSource: Wikidata
CEO
Pam MurphySource: Wikidata
Headquarters
San MateoSource: Wikidata
Sector
Computer securitySource: Wikidata
Listed on
New York Stock Exchange (IMPV)Source: Wikidata
Wikipedia
Read on WikipediaSource: Wikidata

Security timeline

  1. Zero-day reported by Cyber Security NewsAdobe Commerce zero-day exploited to deploy PSK Agent remote access tool
  2. Vulnerability reported by GBHackersHackers exploit critical StyleSmuggler flaw in Magento and Adobe Commerce to deploy PSK Agent RAT

Recent news

Cyber Security News· · Critical

Adobe Commerce zero-day exploited to deploy PSK Agent remote access tool

A zero-day in and , named StyleSmuggler and tracked as CVE-2026-75650, lets unauthenticated attackers run code on stores, affecting all current versions including 2.4.9. observed a campaign between 9 and 13 September 2026 that dropped the PSK Agent remote access tool, with a 0% detection rate on VirusTotal at the time of analysis, across Western Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific.

GBHackers· · Critical

Hackers exploit critical StyleSmuggler flaw in Magento and Adobe Commerce to deploy PSK Agent RAT

Attackers exploited the critical StyleSmuggler vulnerability in and to deploy , a remote access trojan that enables command execution, traffic proxying and persistent server access. The campaign ran from 9 to 13 September 2026 and targeted stores across Western Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. Imperva's earlier analysis gives the flaw a CVSS score of 10.0 and reports exploitation before the article's cut-off.

CSO Online·

Vendor-authored guide urges WAAP buyers to weigh SecureIQLab v5.0 test results and false positive rates

The article, which promotes , argues that WAAP platforms should be compared on two measures from the Cloud WAAP v5.0 test: attack blocking and false positive avoidance, across 12 products and 1,608 attack and 1,487 legitimate-traffic scenarios. It recommends asking vendors about protocol-by-protocol API coverage, time to a tuned low false-positive state over two weeks of real traffic, and licensing costs over 24 to 36 months of growth. It reports that Imperva scored 100% on both measures in that test, and notes that no single platform suits every environment.

Last updated 4 November 2026. Facts come from our own stories, NVD and CISA KEV, MITRE ATT&CK and Wikidata, each named beside the fact; the introduction, when there is one, is from Wikipedia. We never show company logos.

Report a mistake