Vendor-authored guide urges WAAP buyers to weigh SecureIQLab v5.0 test results and false positive rates

The article, which promotes Imperva, argues that WAAP platforms should be compared on two measures from the SecureIQLab Cloud WAAP v5.0 test: attack blocking and false positive avoidance, across 12 products and 1,608 attack and 1,487 legitimate-traffic scenarios. It recommends asking vendors about protocol-by-protocol API coverage, time to a tuned low false-positive state over two weeks of real traffic, and licensing costs over 24 to 36 months of growth. It reports that Imperva scored 100% on both measures in that test, and notes that no single platform suits every environment.

For IT people · Written by AI from 1 source · Wrong?